Check Out This Issue
Navigation
Ad
Subscriber Services
Who's online
Blogs
- ‘Dancing With the Stars’ recap: November 17 results
- ‘Dancing With the Stars’ recap: November 16
- ‘Dancing With the Stars’ recap: November 10 results
- ‘Dancing With the Stars’ recap: November 9
- ‘Dancing With the Stars’ recap: November 3 results
- ‘Dancing With the Stars’ recap: November 2
- ‘Dancing With the Stars’ recap: October 27 results
- ‘Dancing With the Stars’ recap: October 26
- ‘Dancing With the Stars’ recap: October 20 results
- ‘Dancing With the Stars’ recap: October 19
Michael Jackson’s not the father?!
Tue, 06/30/2009 - 15:16 — Anonymous
It seems that none of Michael Jackson’s children belonged to him.
At least one source has told TMZ.com that Michael is not their biological father. All three kids were conceived through in vitro fertilization, and he was not the sperm donor for any of the procedures.
Debbie Rowe, his ex-wife and the woman who carried the two oldest kids, isn’t their biological mother, either. There’s no word on whether he chose the donors or if he knew their identities.
It’s also been reported that the surrogate who birthed Blanket (Prince Michael II) never knew that Michael was the person who would be raising him.
On top of that, Michael didn’t actually adopt the children. According to TMZ, the King of Pop never filed the legal adoption papers for his kids. However, legal experts have said that because they lived with Michael, he’s presumed to be their father.
Supposedly, MJ never adopted the kids because he didn’t think there was another person who would try to claim them.
-- Sonya Eskridge
Here’s more:
Mijac’s kids unmasked
Katherine Jackson claims the kids
Joe Jackson left out of Michael’s will
Tagged: Music, MIchael Jackson, Entertainment News
- Login or register to post comments
-
- Printer-friendly version
Friday, March 19, 2010
Weekly Inspiration
Poll
Recent comments
Who's new
- CHEDA20
- saundee4
- mochacashmere2
- abeeyutefulmess
- ladysongbird
Copyright 2009 Sister 2 Sister, Inc.
Comments
I do not agree with the statement that "none of Michael Jackson’s children belonged to him." I am a Step Mom. I've raised my two daughters since they were 2 and 4. They are now healthy 8 and 10 years old. Because the birth mom has not given up her parental rights (even though she is not a part of their life), I can not legally adopt them. So even as their Step Mom; and I am the woman that raised them - I still do not have legal rights if something happens to my husband. The point is - I raised my children with my Husband. My daughters belong to me.
There are millions of children raised by Step Parents and or relatives. Just because you don't give birth to a child or have legal rights (which is the case for most Step Parents), it does not mean that the child does not belong to you. If you raise them, care for them and make sure that grow up to be healthy strong people - yes, that child belongs to you. You are the parent/guardian of that child.
Although, I do find it strange that MJ did not legally adopt his children for his and their protection, that does not change that he raised them as his own children.